On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 07:03:07PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: > "Graham Percival" <[email protected]> wrote in message > news:[email protected]... > >If anybody doesn't like this sacrifice of quality, then step forward > >and offer to do Bug Squad work. > > I have been watching "issues to verify" carefully, and we do > continue to sign them off - Dmytro is especially excellent in this. > On 29/8 there were 13 to do for .31 - it was down to only one today > - partly thanks to your help, too.
My help isn't a good thing; I only step in when something seems seriously wrong. And I'm now very strict about "10 hours a week"; if I spend half an hour cleaning up bug reports, then that's half an hour that I'm not spending on something that's more specialized. I think the target should be to verify (or reject verification) for all items within a week of the release. If it's slower than that, then it starts to become a problem for developers and the release cycle -- if a fix doesn't work, it's good for the programmer to return to the problem before he forgets what he did. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
