"James Lowe" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:ee5ed9503d57144e895fa3d7533e9fd302408...@mail2...
Hello,
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] on behalf of Phil
Holmes
Sent: Sun 03/10/2010 10:57
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Lilypond crash
I've attached a graph of how both use working set memory - it does appear to
be related to trying to allocate a total of more than about 450 megs. It's
not a problem with physical memory being available - my PC has 6 Gig and
it's nowhere hear using it all.
---
What about Paged and Non-Paged Pool memory? Does it use all of this - with
windows 2003/XP there was a relatively small amount available no matter how
many GB of RAM you had, with Windows 2008/Vista/7 the memory management was
changed - I won't pretend to know how - but the NPP resources were
significantly more (esp on 64 bit machines) but even so not infinite.
James
---
This was what Windows describes as "Private Working Set". It's physical
memory, but there's lots there still to be allocated.
--
Phil Holmes
Bug Squad
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
