On Fri 01 Oct 2010, 13:47 Keith E OHara wrote: > >"Mark Polesky" wrote: > >>Carl Sorensen wrote: > >>>I think that autobeaming in cadenzas should beam according > >>>to baseMoment, [ ... ] > >> The very concept of beats within a cadenza goes against the > >>whole idea of a cadenza in the first place. [ ... ] > >>The user will almost always need to do some manual beams. > > Perhaps the best answer is to have \candezaOn turn off autobeaming. > > Keith OHara wrote > >Even though a cadenza has a free rhythm and is not divided into bars, > >itusually has a rhythmic structure, and is written using the usual > >conventionsof music with a beat. Beethoven's 'emperor' concerto [ ... ] > > > Just because I like closure ... > > The way auto-beaming 'worked' 2.12 was by accident, so the change I noticed > with 2.13 is _not_ a bug. > > Opinions of correct behavior are varied, so we have _no_ enhancement request. > > We recommend that users manually beam in cadenzas, at least in long cadenzas. > > > Myself, I make mistakes typing manual beams. In cadenzas where I want > pattered beams, I can use \cadenzaOff\bar""\cadenzaOn at the natural breaks. > This resets measurePosition to zero often enough that auto-beaming happens to > 'work' and helps me find when I miss a note. I know LilyPond does not > guarantee that behavior. > > The more disciplined among us can \cadenzaOn\autoBeamOff . . . > \cadenzaOff\autoBeamOn I've added 1289 though: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1289
Thank you. -- Dmytro O. Redchuk Bug Squad _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
