On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Carl Sorensen <[email protected]> wrote: > > I agree that a revert would be more appropriate. However, a revert would > be very difficult to accomplish, because there is no easy way to save the > "original" value. The value is only known in the translation stage as a > context property, so we can't really save the value for use in the parsing > stage. > > Right now, the benefit/time ration isn't high enough for me to code the > revert. > > I'm fine to have an enhancement request to implement it as a revert, > however.
Reported here: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1304 Thanks, Patrick _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
