Roman Stawski <roman <at> stawski.fr> writes: > > Thanks Francisco and Carl > > The problem you had earlier was that the scheme was not evaluated during the > > parsing stage, but during the translation stage. And there is no implied > > relationship between parsing order and translation order. > > > > If you want stuff to happen in parsing order, it's necessary to make sure > > the code is evaluated during parsing. > The natural question is "how do I make sure that the counter is evaluated > during parsing?" >
Very sorry! This should be a follow up to the thread "Funny Bug or feature?. instrumentNames rendered in reverse order than". (I hit the senda bit too quick) _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
