>> Yes, there is definitely a bug here. A large penalty of "50" is
>> added to some of the betting-looking slurs to avoid "extra
>> encompass" objects, but I can't see what object these particular
>> slurs are trying to avoid in this case; removing the forced
>> accidental still yields the same penalty.
>
> The extra encompass is the TupletNumber. Perhaps we should change
> its default for 'avoid-slur to 'around.
Yes, maybe – does it fix the problem? BTW, thanks for looking into
this issue. The slur code IMHO needs a complete rework, since many
slur shape decisions are butt ugly. Hopefully, I find some time in
the nearer future to examine the algorithms in detail, possibly
suggesting improved rules.
Werner
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
