On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 01:26:41PM +0100, Xavier Scheuer wrote: > On 8 November 2010 13:05, Valentin Villenave <[email protected]> wrote: > > Please repost your mail as a comment there, I think it will be more > > appropriate, useful and (possibly) efficient :-) > > Actually I'm sad when I see this issue is tagged "Type-Enhancement" > and "Priority-Postponed". > From a user point of view it is really a "HIGH annoyance" issue, since
Then offer a bounty, or start investigating how to fix it yourself. > And besides I see other issues that are *not* postponed and have a far > higher priority level that are issues purely "hypothetical" that have > almost no chances to appear in "real-world" scores. If the different of priority levels are important to you, point out the "hypothetical" problems and I'll lower their priority. > We could have a kind of "polling system" to determine what are the > features/issues that are really wanted by users. That already exists; there's a "stars" function built-in to google code. It's not particularly useful, but go ahead and "star" issues that you care about. > And also a point about bounties/sponsors in relation (there are people > on the french mailing list that wants to donate to the project but it > currently lacks a structure to manage these donations). Such a discussion would happen during GOP, after 2.14 is out. I have added it to list. - Graham _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
