"Neil Puttock" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On 21 November 2010 23:16, Graham Percival <[email protected]>
wrote:
Huh. So evidently there's some other reason behind the fix for
this break not being detected? It might be related to the
imagemagick's syntax change:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=908
I don't think this is the problem.
The check relies on a grob existing in the baseline image for
comparison with the check image; in this case, there's no BassFigure
in the original image, and its appearance in the changed image has no
effect on other bounding boxes, so there's no distance change.
Cheers,
Neil
So if a completely new bit of graphics appears, the regtest checker wouldn't
spot it? Not sure that's too good. What's the checker written in?
--
Phil Holmes
Bug Squad
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
