Reinhold Kainhofer <[email protected]> writes: > Am Dienstag, 28. Dezember 2010, um 14:23:14 schrieb Phil Holmes: >> "David Kastrup" <[email protected]> wrote in message >> > I don't think it is correct. If you set the above with \key g\major, >> > you will notice that the key signature is _not_ repeated with a clef >> > change. So there is no visual or logical reason to assume "accidentals >> > are reset". If that was the underlying assumption for a clef change, >> > the key signature would be repeated. >> >> So I'm confused as to what the regtest text cited means. It >> (accidental-clef-change.ly) says "Accidentals are reset for clef changes." > > > I would be great, though, if anyone can find a published example of such a > situation (most likely in e.g. cello/bassoon parts/scores, which frequently > switch between bass and tenor clef).
Edition Peters, piano excerpt by Brissler from Mozart Requiem, "Confutatis". The g in the corni di bassotto entry is not even in the same octave, and still gets a natural.
confutatis.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
-- David Kastrup
_______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
