On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 00:19:04 -0800, Graham Percival <[email protected]>
wrote:
To be clear, you're suggesting that we remove the octavation
example and use this instead?
Yes.
I'm not entirely sold on this particular example -- it doesn't
follow our input syntax style, and if we add all the line breaks
that would be required, it gets a bit long. Can you (or anybody
else) create a different example, or modify the existing one?
I was thinking of one real bug that was re-reported last week, which can be
extremely brief:
% There should be a natural printed after the sharp
\version "2.12.3"
<< f' \\ fis' >>
The regression tests are of this form, and I think a lot came from real bugs.
This one makes the point that correct notation is not always immediately
obvious:
% Accidentals should be printed for only the first note in a tie
\version "2.10.1"
\relative c'' {
bes1 ~ |
bes1
}
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
