Joe Neeman <joenee...@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 7:46 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >> >> I have not looked at the code, but this sounds like an accident >> waiting to happen again and/or like being hard to read. Would there >> be a feasible way to reduce the place where the actual updating is >> being done to _one_ location (like an inline private member function >> or whatever else) instead of needing to cater with continuing having >> to do maintain any further "change in all of the places where it was >> required"? >> > > There used to be two functions to compute system_count. Now there is > only one.
Thanks. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
