Trevor Daniels <t.daniels <at> treda.co.uk> writes: > > > Comment #14 on issue 1483 by [email protected]: Lyric > > alignment is > > wrong in 2.13.46 > > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1483
> > Second, I wonder if it might be possible to have a setting, > > something like make-lyrics-loose, that could be adjusted to let > > the user select between 2.12 and 2.13 behavior. If > > make-lryics-loose is #t, the staves would be placed first, then > > filled in with the lyrics. If make-lyrics-loose is #f, then the > > lyrics would be fit in as part of the sytems along with the > > staves. > > I haven't tried it, but the docs say setting > staff-affinity to #f causes non-staff lines to > be treated as staves. Might this do what you > want? It doesn't do what I want. I think it means that the staff-staff-spacing variables are used instead of the staff-nonstaff spacing variables. The space for the lyrics is still not created unless it is manually added in the \paper block, as part of 'system-system-spacing , 'top-system-spacing, or 'system-bottom-spacing. > > > At any rate, I think that with the understanding that we need to > > 1) use alignAboveContext for lyrics above a staff, and 2) make > > space for lyrics, with top-system-spacing, system-system-spacing, > > system-bottom-spacing, and default-staff-staff-spacing, I think > > we can move this bug to a Documentation bug (still Critical), if > > we can't fix it using the make-lyrics-loose idea from above. > > The docs certainly could be improved. I wonder if > the best approach is to visit the lyrics templates > in the LM and set these up with appropriate overrides? > One or two more to illustrate different lyric layouts > would be helpful too. This makes sense to me. Thanks, Carl _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
