"Graham Percival" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:20110303100109.GA13658@futoi...
Perhaps we should just say that the Bug Squad should ignore any
"issue to verify" that is tagged with "Patch" ? we can find
somebody else that can check if a patch was actually pushed.
Cheers,
- Graham
TBH I think that's ducking the issue. Taking 1535 as an example, it was
called "Adding the Tweak_engraver to the Dynamics context". If it had been
called "Making tweaks work in a Dynamics context" it would have been easier
to guess what it was intended to do. If it had included the code you added,
it would have taken a moment to test and verify. I think we should work to
a standard of easily comprehensible patches with sample code - if we do, any
bug squad member would be able to test and verify quickly and we'll have a
nice clean list of issues to verify.
--
Phil Holmes
Bug Squad
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
