Phil Holmes-2 wrote: > > It looks like the LilyPond installation is no longer adding the path to > the executable to the Windows PATH. I have installed .54 and don't have > it on my path. For me that's actually good - my PATH variable overflowed > and I lost all the ones I wanted. However, for people who rely on the > command line, it'll mean LP won't run. Can someone check whether this has > been changed in the Windows install? >
i cleaned my path and downloaded 2.13.54 - lilypond is in the path again! couldn't the path be checked before a lilypond entry is appended? cheers Eluze -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Re%3A-lilypond-v2.13.54-tp31171211p31171995.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
