Comment #3 on issue 1702 by [email protected]: Unaesthetic beam slope http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1702
I think that, in general, any change to lilypond that occasions an aesthetic regression, even if it is an intentional change, should be considered a bug and thus not be marked as invalid. Ideally, we should find a way to restore the old behavior (or improve the new behavior) in these cases.
_______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
