Comment #11 on issue 1234 by [email protected]: Fill-line should
not use word space, but should use springs-and-rods
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1234
+1 for Neil and Dmytro: Leave it as it is.
Unless I totally missed some other commit, \fill-line /does/ still use
word-space.
I tried to remove this in my initial patch for issue #382 and issue #1116,
but it mixed up output when the spacing is very tight.
I'd prefer this to use a spring-and-rods approach /additional/ to
word-space, that's why it went in as an enhancement in the tracker.
(However, I'm not sure anymore if there is an existing implementation of
spring-and-rods which can be used here; I suppose it has to be a Scheme
implementation?)
But this is actually a change in semantics, which is not covered by the
other issues.
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
