+1 generally, 2011/7/29 Graham Percival <[email protected]>: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:42:23AM +0200, Urs Liska wrote: >> I think the question at hand is: Shouldn't any discussion of issues >> already on the tracker be done only on the tracker. > > I think so. > >> But this has of course to be done manually by anybody posting a >> comment to an issue. > > Yes, that's a pain. > >> Of course the tracker or mailing list software can't possibly >> interpret mails and eventually route it to a tracker issue (at least >> not reliably) ... > > Actually, Rietveld does this quite painlessly. Just reply to a > codereview email and it shows up on Rietveld. It would be nice if > the bug tracker worked in the same way. > > Anybody up for filing a feature enhancement with them?
Done: http://code.google.com/p/support/issues/detail?id=5632 The harderst part was finding tracker of the tracker's issues. cheers, Janek _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
