2011/9/13 David Kastrup <[email protected]>: > Janek Warchoł <[email protected]> writes: > >> 2011/9/13 David Kastrup <[email protected]>: >>> Janek Warchoł <[email protected]> writes: >>> >>>> I'd think that in every case the accidentals would be on the same >>>> level, but they're not. I don't see any property to override this. A >>>> bug? >>>> >>>> \new ChordNames { \chordmode { fis es } } >>>> >>>> \new ChordNames { \germanChords \chordmode { fis es } } >>>> >>>> \new ChordNames { \italianChords \chordmode { fis es } } >>> >>> Well, there is at least some consistency: in each language, the results >>> look awful, though by different means. >> >> Exactly... You may be interested in my other mail about accidentals >> and chord names, "do we want special versions of the accidentals for >> use with text?" > > Is that a trick question? What is wrong with ♯ and ♭? Those are > obviously the versions to use with text, having been _designed_ into the > text fonts.
With "do we want special versions of the accidentals for use with text?" i was referring to a thread on the mailing list with this topic: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2011-09/msg00353.html cheers, Janek _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
