Am Donnerstag, 22. September 2011, 18:07:42 schrieb David Kastrup: > Graham Percival <[email protected]> writes: > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 02:11:53PM +0300, Dmytro O. Redchuk wrote: > >> On Thu 22 Sep 2011, 13:01 Janek Warchoł wrote: > >> > However, according to Benko Pal we shouldn't worry about it: > >> > > >> > 2011/9/19 Benkő Pál <[email protected]>: > >> > > this is an impossible ligature, LilyPond should (but never did) > >> > > refuse it (with an explanation).
I wouldn't say "refuse it", I would propose to print a warning and continue processing (like we do with all other kinds of wrong input).... > >> If lilypond should refuse it (with an explanation) -- please, can anyone > >> prepare a tiny example? > > > > If somebody says "this is a regression test", then you can skip > > the tiny example and just add it directly. All our developers > > know what the regression tests are. :) > > I don't think we can currently employ regression tests that have > _failure_ as the desired behavior. We can. Look at input/regression/safe.ly Cheers, Reinhold -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Reinhold Kainhofer, [email protected], http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/ * Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria * http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886 * LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
