On Nov 26, 2011, at 11:28 PM, [email protected] wrote: > On Nov 26, 2011, at 10:19 PM, Keith OHara wrote: > >> On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 00:38:50 -0800, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Keith, >>> retested. >>> >> Sorry to call you by the wrong name, James. My eyes saw pkx166h and my >> brain though "p h? no that's James" but my fingers were already typed Phil. >> >> I still seems strange that \textLengthOn is failing for you in >> 'string-number-around-slur.ly' after this patch, because the patch doesn't >> touch text lengths. But I will stop worrying because, Mike is likely to >> drop this patch, > > True that...it's a crappy patch. The real problem, as you've pointed out, > are the extents of Scripts. > > I'll get on it w/in the next two-ish weeks. >
I revisited the patch and realized that it's crappiness was due to a miscalculation - I've reposted it, and I think it works well now. Cheers, MS _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
