Status: Accepted
Owner: [email protected]
Labels: Type-Maintainability
New issue 2092 by [email protected]: lily-git.tcl should using
a "working" branch
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2092
Strictly a change "under the hood": could lily-git.tcl put commits on its
own "working" branch, merging from master to working, etc?
AFAIK the user-visible material shouldn't change at all, but if anybody
starts to learn more about git and tries out gitk or the like on their
repo, I'd like them to see that their stuff is on working instead of
master. Otherwise we'll be sending them mixed messages.
I am completely revising our git instructions in the CG, and will be
directing people to use branches, of if they really don't want to, to at
least keep stuff on "working".
(NB for non-git-savvy people: I think I can explain branches much simpler
than most git tutorials, so don't get scared. Besides, there's nothing
stopping you from keeping your same work-flow if you want.)
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond