On 16 December 2011 19:48, Thomas Scharkowski <[email protected]> wrote: > \times 2/3 { b16 b b } b8 b4 b b > > 2.15.22 produces a (wrong) beam subdivison. > 2.14.2 output is correct. > See attachments.
Result is fine with 2.15.20. I did not make a git-bisect but I suspect Carl's fix for issue #11 to be the cause of this. http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=11 I'm not a git expert but it seems Carl's commit was pushed a few hours after 2.15.20 release, so issue #11 should have been tagged as fixed_2_15_21, isn't it? A better wording for this issue report would be something like "unexpected beamlet in tuplet sixteenth". But maybe it is better to reopen issue #11. Cheers, Xavier -- Xavier Scheuer <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
