Comment #4 on issue 2149 by [email protected]: Patch: Creates
non-negative-integer? predicate.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2149
guile> (positive? 0)
#f
Following Neil's suggestion, I think that we should stick to the way that
Guile defines these things. It is true that non-negative-integer is
awkward, but it seems to be the most concise way to state the type in a
guile framework.
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
