lilypond-4 wrote: > > Updates: > Status: Fixed > Labels: -Patch-review > small typo: extension is misspelled as extensio
preview This option is supported by all backends; pdf, png, ps, eps and svg, but not scm and generates an output file containing the titles and the first system of music. If \bookpart blocks are used, the titles and first system of every \bookpart will appear in the output. An additional file in the form myFile.preview.extensio is generated, to avoid this use the additional ‘-dprint-pages’ or ‘-dno-print-pages’ options according to your requirements. when reading this text i don't feel comfortable! wouldn't it be better to say what this option does and what the result is. mention which backends support it or don't give a hint on how to suppress the usual output! this could be: "This option generates an output file (in the form myFile.preview.extension) containing the titles and the first system of music. If \bookpart blocks are used, the titles and the first system of every \bookpart will appear in the output. This option is supported by all backends (pdf, png, ps, eps and svg) but not scm By default the usual output is produced - to avoid this use the additional -dprint-pages" just to mention: when you run a -dpreview with --pdf there are 3 files generated: preview.pdf preview.png preview.eps isn't that too much? should this be tracked? Eluze -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Issue-2112-in-lilypond%3A-documentation%3A-precising--dpreview-tp32989738p33055466.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
