Hello, On 9 January 2012 22:00, Ralph Palmer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Xavier Scheuer <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I noticed this while replying to James. >> >> \override Hairpin #'minimum-length = #8 does not take into account the >> fact that a hairpin can be shortened by the presence of a DynamicText. >> >> "minimum-length" is applied not the real length of the hairpin, but to >> the length of the hairpin **if it would not have been shortened by the >> presence of a dynamic**. IMHO it should apply to the _real length_ of >> the hairpin (the printed one!), even if it is a "shortened hairpin" >> (hey, it is usually these "shortened hairpins" that we —the users— want >> to lengthen when we \override Hairpin #'minimum-length !!).
... > This has been submitted as issue 2207 : > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2207 > > I designated it "ugly", but I'm not sure that's the best category. > I'd say that was the best category. -- -- James _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
