2012/1/23 David Kastrup <[email protected]>: > Thomas Scharkowski <[email protected]> writes: > >>> Thomas Scharkowski<[email protected]> writes: >>> >>>> Thank you. >>>> Neil's workaround should not be necessary - this is a bug, isn't it? >>> >>> Personally, I consider glaringly dissimilar spacing in adjacent bars >>> more of a bug than the other way round. If there were a line break in >>> between, this might be different, but stepping on the brakes for your >>> eye movement like that does not seem healthy to me. >>> >> I understand your point and agree, but I still think the distance 1st >> note - 2nd note should be smaller than the distance 2nd to 3rd note >> (in my first example). This simply looks wrong to me. >> >> I do attach an excerpt of my "real world" example, without >> \newSpacingSection. > > I'd say that spacing becomes tight too fast here, not that it starts out > too lose. > > -- > David Kastrup > > _______________________________________________ > bug-lilypond mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
FWIW: if I compile \upper only, the spacing is more convincing.
\version "2.15.24"
upper =
\relative c'' {
\voiceOne
\repeat unfold 8 {c32 c c c} |
c4 c2 c4
}
lower = \relative c'' {
\voiceTwo
s1
a2 a
}
\score
{
<<
\upper
\\
\lower
>>
}
\upper
Cheers,
Harm
<<attachment: atest-08.png>>
_______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
