2012/1/25 -Eluze <[email protected]>:
> I've never used lilypond-book,
> emacs, probably I've used python or guile in the background - but certainly
> I'm not in the position to verify such specific issues.
>
> I wonder who is going to clarify these issues!?

If i were you, i'd try contacting people who reported them (reported
at bug-lilypond, not added to the tracker).  Unfortunately it's not
always possible.

> then I  stumbled upon issue 2109 "do not tinker with the position of a
> pitched rest" where I couldn't find a description of the issue, only
> solutions or a patch.

That's very bad (and it was me who pushed this patch - oops...).
My opinion is: patches that don't contain sufficient description (this
may or may not include a regression test) should not be accepted.

thanks,
Janek

_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Reply via email to