Hello, On 3 February 2012 21:00, Marek Klein <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > 2012/2/1 Robin Bannister <[email protected]> > >> In >> http://code.google.com/p/**lilypond/issues/detail?id=**2026#c32<http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2026#c32>Ian >> Hulin wrote: >> >>> This is fixed if we move the definition of the \null markup to the before >>> the empty-markup declaration and change empty-markup to >>> (define-public (empty-markup) >>> make-null-markup)) >>> ... >>> It's built the docs successfully and run reg-tests OK. >>> >> >> >> OK, the docs say \null markup is an "empty markup", merely a single point, >> but it has _position_, which empty-markup does not. >> The following snippet demonstrates this difference: >> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% >> offset = \markup \translate #'(9 . 9) "offset" >> \markup \line { "concat with empty-markup:" \box \concat { \empty-markup >> \offset } " concat with null markup: "\box \concat { \null \offset } >> } >> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% >> > > Is this a bug report? I am not sure; 2026 is still open, is it not better > to add a coment to the issue?
I think so, but to be honest only David or Ian can probably answer that. I'd hold off from creating a new tracker for now. -- -- James _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
