>> LGTM, together with the other ones.  I suggest to apply such
>> straightforward, mainly cosmetic changes without creating issues.
> 
> Ok, though I'd appreciate a sanity-check LGTM from patchy before
> going forward.  I want to make sure that I am not killing off a
> stencil that is buried somewhere in the code base I haven't looked.

Hmm, is it really necessary to create an issue in the bug tracker so
that patchy checks the patch?  The number of emails sent from google
code and rietveld is really huge, and I think it's far too easy to
miss the important changes.

We still have the log file from the git repository itself, and
currently I have the feeling that we are doing the same a second time.


   Werner

_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Reply via email to