David Kastrup <dak <at> gnu.org> writes: > If you compare the release dates for LilyPond 2.14.2 and MacOSX 10.7.3, > it should be obvious that a bug report does not make much sense before > actually cross-checking with the latest unstable release reflecting more > recent developments. >
Wait a minute - if I go to a web page and I see there is a download for Mac OS X, I can assume that it's working as long as there is no hint that it might not. So, it would really make sense to add a hint on the Mac download page that the last stable version might not work with Lion. By the way - it would be really nice if you'd just answer by "The last stable version does not work with Mac OS 10.7.3. We did not have the man power to develop a newer one yet. So please use the unstable version or wait for a new stable release." Maybe you wanted to be funny, but it sounded more like a hidden accusation. As described, I do not think that I NEED to check an unstable version if there is no hint of it on the page. The unstable version starts correctly by the way. Thanks for your help Hanno _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
