Updates:
Labels: -Patch-countdown Patch-needs_work
Comment #3 on issue 2308 by [email protected]: Patch: Checks to see
that stencil commands have the correct number of arguments.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2308
DCan we resolve the question of whether this is ready or not, please? There
is discussion in rather . . . blunt . . . tones which suggests it needs
work. Mike/David/Han-Wen, please update status.
Off tracker and off Rietveld discussion quoted for context:
Mike wrote
"Han-Wen,
Is there a specific reason for using a permanent Scheme variable in the C++
instead of a lookup call to the lily module? If it's just happenstance
then I'll move these structures to Scheme and access them from the Scheme
module."
Han-Wen replied:
"My idea is was to abstract the concrete list away.
There is no strong reason for that though, so if you want to change
it, feel free."
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
