Comment #10 on issue 2343 by [email protected]: Faulty file-naming when
outputting multiple \books
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2343
Ian, the patch does not change the use of "output-suffix". As long as you
don't declare a book specific suffix with \bookOutputSuffix (or an
assignment to book-outputsuffix or book-filename in a \paper block), the
old usage will work as before.
Would it make sense to use the paper variables output-suffix and, uh,
output-filename instead? Looks redundant to have "book-" in the variable
name, and, after all, there seems little wrong with just declaring
\book { \paper { outputsuffix = "xxx" } }
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
