On Mar 1, 2012, at 4:12 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > Comment #90 on issue 2148 by [email protected]: vertical skylines should use > stencil integrals > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2148 > > If transparency is not supposed to have an impact anymore, why do we still > have different callbacks for "maybe-transparent" stencils even in the latest > iteration? If this is dead code, it should be removed. There should only be > one callback, and it should not look at transparency. >
Because I haven't pushed my tabVoice code yet. It doesn't have an impact in the regression tests you're talking about, but it would have an impact in all of the tab regtests. Once I push the tabVoice patch, I'll be able to get rid of this code. _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
