Updates:
Labels: Patch-review
Comment #9 on issue 2397 by [email protected]: Tuplet number incorrectly placed
when using additonal arriculations and/or abreak
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2397#c9
Patchy the autobot says: LGTM. No visible regtest changes. Of course,
this is a bit dissatisfactory for a patch with regtest. Perhaps we should
push regtests with a focus on visual differences (rather than crashes or
new features) to staging before the patch itself goes through testing?
That way, the regtests would show differences when things are fixed, rather
than only when they go bad again.
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
