On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Graham Percival <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:11:46AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: >> So instead of surprising volunteers by giving them more information than >> expected we give them less information than expected? > > Bug squad members shouldn't be reading tracker messages anyway. > > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/bug-squad-setup > ------------ > 5. 2. Any other email either from, or CC’d to, > [email protected] > should go into a separate bug-ignore folder. Alternately, you may > automatically delete these emails. > > You will not read these emails as part of your Bug Squad duties. > If you are curious, go ahead and read them later, but it does not > count as Bug Squad work. > ------------ > > I'm serious about wanting this to be a 20-minute-per-week job. > I seriously think it's possible if people follow the guidelines > strictly (ok, so then they'd be "rules" rather than "guidelines"). > However, humans are harder to program than python or C. After > years of failure with regards to the duration, it's time to try > another tactic. I've been thinking about this for years. > > The main reason I did it now is that Patchy will be sending more > info for the automatic countdowns, and should be sending more info > for the staging-merge, so I want a good place to send that stuff.
sounds reasonable to me. Janek _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
