Keith OHara <[email protected]> writes:

>  <lilypond <at> googlecode.com> writes:
>
>> Comment #3 on issue 2436 by [email protected]: Patch: Directs  
>>
>> I'm trying to ensure that all progress messages go to stderr, 
>> not stdout.  A by-product of this is that they are captured in 
>> logfiles during make test and can also be checked as part of  
>> the regression testing process.
>> 
>
> It is arguable whether the ancestry listings are progress messages
> or program output.  The hoi polloi won't use that snippet at all,
> but those they do use it probably do something like
>   C:> lilypond displaying-grob-ancestry.ly >out.txt 2>err.txt
> and will be mildly inconvenienced when the ancestry listings have
> other progress messages interspersed.
>
> I think it's fine to inconvenience them in this case.  The similar 
> but more widely useful function \displayLilyMusic that is included
> in LilyPond has your optional output-port argument, which is great
> for making everybody happy.

Except that it hasn't.  The respective commit has been reverted because
it had the side-effect of making \displayLilyMusic c' stop working.

-- 
David Kastrup


_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Reply via email to