On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:07:05PM +0200, Urs Liska wrote: > I think I stumbled over a bit of misleading or wrong information in the NR.
I agree. I had a look and found issue 391 entitled "using relative filepath in \include "foo.ly"" http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=391 It looks like this was fixed in 2009 and released in the 2.12.x series. > Please have a look at the following documentation suggestion and > incorporate it into the NR if you find it correct: I haven't tested it but going by the issue tracker your suggestion makes sense. Thanks very much for doing a thorough job. See new documentation tracker: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2558 -- Colin Hall _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
