On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 04:02:42PM +0200, Philip Thomas wrote: > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Colin Hall [mailto:[email protected]] > >Sent: Monday 11 June 2012 15:40 > >To: Philip Thomas > >Cc: [email protected] > >Subject: Re: Consecutive melismata - error in NR? > > > >Thanks for the report, Philip. I tried your example and I agree that the > >documentation seems misleading. > > > >I wonder if it was intended to warn the user against this situation, > >which typesets fine but gives a warning: > > > >\relative c'' > ><< > > \new Voice = "melody" { > > \time 3/4 > > f4 g8 > > \melisma > > f e f > > \melismaEnd > > \melisma > > f e f > > \melismaEnd > > e2. > > } > > \new Lyrics \lyricsto "melody" { > > E -- le -- i -- son > > } > >>> > > > > Thanks, Colin, for taking the matter up. > > Without wishing to labor the point unnecessarily, just to point out that > your example does not in fact typeset properly, in that the "-son" syllable > at the end is missing.
Sorry about that, my mistake. Thanks for picking it up. Cheers, Colin. -- Colin Hall _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
