On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 01:21:07PM +0200, Federico Bruni wrote: > Il 24/06/2012 13:12, David Kastrup ha scritto: > >Federico Bruni<[email protected]> writes: > > > >>Il 24/06/2012 12:50, David Kastrup ha scritto: > >>>git grep -n "index \\\\book" > >>>Documentation/notation/input.itely:273:@funindex \bookOutputSuffix > >>>Documentation/notation/input.itely:274:@funindex \bookOutputName > >>>Documentation/notation/input.itely:346:@funindex \book > >>>Documentation/notation/input.itely:347:@funindex \bookpart > >>>Documentation/notation/spacing.itely:1378:@funindex \bookpart > >> > >>Thanks, this proves that they are not in the general index, which > >>requires @cindex. > > > >Hm? > > > > I don't know texinfo at all, I guessed it from here: > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/syntax-survey#indexing > > But now I think that a @funindex creates an entry also in the > general index, not only in the command index. > > >>So my original request makes sense. > >> > >>@funindex should create an item in the command index, right? > >>Why I can't see \book and \bookpart there? A bug or what? > > > >More likely because you are looking under "B" rather than "\". > > > > That's it! > Not straightforward.. I can see that there's an open issue: > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=855
I've added a link to that tracker, Federico, pointing to your post that started this thread. Thanks for the report. As far as I can tell there is no new bug here. Cheers, Colin. -- Colin Hall _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
