-Eluze <[email protected]> writes: > dak-3 wrote: >> >> >> >>> I don't think there is a bug here. >> >> Well, you reproduce the described behavior. No idea whether to call it >> a bug. >> > > I don't think we should - most important is that the conversions happen! > > the best we could do is to recommend to use the options -de - is it worth > it?
-e is orthogonal to the purported problem: it just means putting the output in the file again instead of on stdout. Which is usually what you want. -d means no update in version header unless changes happen. That is also usually what you would want. Without -d, the version of the last applicable rule is used instead (rather than the last rule actually causing a change). In the case that no rule would be applied because the file is already newer than all rules, I think it would make sense _not_ to change the version header even without -d. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
