On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 09:50:46PM +0200, Marek Klein wrote: > Hello, > > 2012/7/16 ArnoldTheresius <[email protected]> > > > > > beam-collision-basic.ly: > > collision of notehad and beam in measure 6, beat 3 + 1/8 > > > > beamlet-test.ly: > > Looks inconsistent to me in some quintuplets > > - measure 1, 3rd group > > - measure 2, 1st group > > - measure 5, 2nd group, 2nd bemlet > > Isue 11, Comment 31, Screenshot-1.png looks good and is what I would > > expect. > > (i.e. in quituplets the five 'internal beats' are used to dertermine the > > direction)
Thanks for the report of those two regressions, Arnold. > > > > By the way, I was not shure for which criteria to search in the issues > > list. Just put a few keywords into the search box. Usually works for me. > Is this a bug report? I do not understand. > Anyone else? Sure. In this email Arnold is highlighting some unexpected differences in output between 2.15.40 and 2.15.41 that he has noticed. Phil Holmes emailed bug-lilypond a few days ago on the same subject. See: http://lilypond.org/development.html which links to the regression test output: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/input/regression/collated-files.html It is a bug squad responsibility to check the regression test output when a new revision of Lilypond comes out. See: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/bug-squad-checklists so Arnold and Phil are doing us a favour. You've done a bunch of work already today, Marek. I'll create the trackers. Cheers, Colin. -- Colin Hall _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
