On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 1:25 PM, David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote: > Karol Majewski <[email protected]> writes: > >> I talked to Janek Warchoł and he said that this output is >> intentional and explained to me everything. However, those >> christmas-tree-flags (as I call them now) still make me sick, [...] > > At any rate: have you tried installing the Gonville fonts? They are > supposed to have a different design. I have no idea how that would make > the flags look, but then I am not all that interested in change.
I believe that the proper way to go is to create a flexible font substitution mechanism. I mean, something more user-friendly than manually replacing font files (i think Gonville uses something like this?). And more powerful, too - it would be great to be able to replace only some glyphs, and compose a font from several components. For example: - take Feta as the basis - apply Gonville on top of this (every glyph that is present in Gonville is replaced, but if there's anything missing (e.g. some accordion symbols), Lily falls back to Feta as the default) - apply a special, user-made version of flags on top of this. This would be cool. I don't have time to write it, but if someone does, i'll review and test it. cheers, Janek _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
