On 6 févr. 2013, at 00:17, David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote: > "[email protected]" <[email protected]> writes: > >> Find #3 was wrong. There should have been no suicides in this precise >> case. LilyPond just does not know how to do spacing on empty >> skylines. This makes sense, as it is difficult to estimate the >> distance between something and nothing. So, I'll use my previous >> solution of flattening the skyline to 0 with a nice comment. > > That sounds nonsensical. A skyline should be able to contain empty > stretches or be completely empty; that should be "neutral", namely let > any neighboring skyline take over. A skyline flattened to 0, however, > will kill the neighboring skyline and replace it with its > maximum/minimum. >
Good call. I think the problem is that the empty skyline is the lowermost, so it impacts system-system spacing with the neighboring system. Not sure how yet... Cheers, MS _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
