Thomas Morley writes: > 2013/3/28 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: >> Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@googlemail.com> writes: >> >>> 2013/3/28 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: >>>> Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@googlemail.com> writes: >>> [...] >>>> Why would you want to have "ChordNames" internal to a Staff? >>> >>> It was requested by a german user. He wants the ChordNames printed in a >>> Staff. >>> Is there a better way to achieve it? >> >> Use a Staff_symbol_engraver (or whatever it's called) in the ChordNames >> context? > > Thanks. Suggested. > > -Harm
Thomas, devs, what do you want to do with this thread? As I understand it, a user on the German forum has tried this, for good reasons, and it failed with a programming error. David explained that this is not surprising. So, we can treat this as a bug, with a resolution that Lilypond detectings the condition and reports it as an error and exits. Or the feature of "ChordNames within a Staff" could be documented using the advice given (but not yet proven?) as per David's last email. Or we can reject the bug report. Please advise. Cheers, Colin. -- Colin Hall _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
