"Phil Holmes" <[email protected]> writes: > "Phil Holmes" <[email protected]> wrote in message > news:[email protected]... >> "Evan Laforge" <[email protected]> wrote in message >> news:CACbaDy6QRYvn_nQrpOVj72wwogDiA=-sdz2qct3niozkm_t...@mail.gmail.com... >>>>>> It's not automatic - you have control. Try using voices, and >>>>>> checking the output for error messages: >>>>> >>>>> Right, it's easy to fix manually, \stemUp works too. But that goes >>>>> for all collision / ugliness bugs. The ideal is that it automatically >>>>> finds the prettiest possible way to lay things out, yes? >>>> >>>> That is consistent with the instructions it has been given. >>> >>> Indeed, but I didn't give it any stem direction instructions, it picks >>> the colliding direction on its own. >> >> Using standard stem direction methods. >> >> We've told you how to correct your error. What's your issue? >> >> -- >> Phil Holmes > > By the way - if you want to spend near to £400 on Sibelius, this is > what is produces given the same input (i.e cross staff stems, no > specification of voicing).
Actually, looks like it's shaving off one pixel from the bottom of the bottom clef. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
