>> If I had my email address clearly exposed in the project page, it >> would be only tangentially more prone to spam than it currently is. I >> do not oppose to show it, possibly with a minimal obfuscation such as >> 'at' 'dot' and the like, which spambots can already decypher anyway.
My email address has been unchanged and exposed for nigh on 25 yrs now. I don't think exposure on the lilypond website is likely to have much effect on the spam I currently receive. I've learnt how to deal with it. > I think if we can manage long-running "project aliases" like > [email protected], that would be preferable. We have > responsibilities shifting not infrequently, and people just _love_ to > consult documentation that has been outdated for decades and/or that is > corresponding to the software version they have installed. That's a reasonable thing to do, but it has no effect on reducing spam. > Alternatively, point people directly to the mailing lists. That's a good suggestion. All the developers are contactable via the devel list, and anyone can post there via gmane without needing to subscribe. Trevor _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
