David Kastrup <[email protected]> writes:

> David Kastrup <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> Mike Solomon <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>>> On 27 mai 2013, at 19:34, David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> David Kastrup <[email protected]> writes:
>>>> 
>>>>> Karol Majewski <[email protected]> writes:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> The following code gives:
>>>>>> warning: cannot fit music on page: overflow is 1096.382978
>>>>>> and no output. Perhaps it's a bug?
>>>> 
>>>> 6f13ef4a292625c1a9d528ac88aec98071ba6388 is the first bad commit
>>>> commit 6f13ef4a292625c1a9d528ac88aec98071ba6388
>>>> Author: Mike Solomon <[email protected]>
>>>> Date:   Fri Mar 22 07:29:57 2013 +0100
>>>> 
>>>>    Permits all positive and zero-length buildings in skylines (issue 3161)
>>>
>>> Ahhhhh crap. I'll look into it this week.
>>
>> This should prove interesting.  The condition for triggering this
>> problem seem so utterly arbitrary.  For what it is worth, the overflow
>> on my computer is
>> warning: cannot fit music on page: overflow is 1636.348835
>> namely quite different.
>>
>> So both the way to trigger this bug as well as the concrete output seem
>> _way_ arbitrary.
>
> It gets more interesting.  Manually "bisecting" on the value gives me an
> overflow of
>
> warning: cannot fit music on page: overflow is 935.595183
>
> for
>
>     \override Stem.thickness = #1.20005

Oh, and the smaller overflow as opposed to thickness 1.2 may be
explained since only one of the two systems goes off-page.

This is totally bonkers.  One could not make this kind of behavior up.

-- 
David Kastrup


_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Reply via email to