ArnoldTheresius <[email protected]> writes: > David Kastrup wrote >> ... >> I am not overly enthused about downing extents for the purpose of >> getting baselines heeded. It's not really intuitive. > > Just an idea: a markup command which evaluates the Y-extent of its argument, > and returns it symetrically expanded ( -max(abs(extent_Y_min), > abs(extent_Y_max)) . +max(abs(extent_Y_min), abs(extent_Y_max))). > > I know, it's to opposite thing of reducing the extent to zero - expand it > with white space to be symmetric.
That kind of construct would behave even more obscure than just zeroing out the extents would. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
