Hi, 2013/6/22 Pavel Roskin <[email protected]>: > It looks like you created an alternative to partcombine! That's very > impressive!
It's almost like implementing the partcombine logic in LilyPond itself :) > But I wonder what limitations your approach has compared to > partcombine. as far as i know, the drawbacks are: - you have to insert the commands eveerywhere inside the music source, - you have to use different definitions of these commands in score and parts. It's quite easy to do this using includes. >> Feel free to use this snippet as you wish :) > > I mean, we need something in Documentation/snippets. ah, ok. Indeed, that'd be useful. > I might try to convert one of the scores from partcombine to your approach. You may want to take a look at https://github.com/janek-warchol/warsztat-nutowy/tree/master/epifania/Cantate%20Domino%20%28Miskinis%29 which was created by my fellow choir members - crowd-engraving at its best :) (https://lilypondblog.wordpress.com/2013/06/04/crowd-engraving-whats-that-part-1/) best, Janek _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
