Federico Bruni <[email protected]> writes: > 2013/8/8 David Kastrup <[email protected]> > >> Federico Bruni <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > I've read this message: >> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-08/msg00148.html >> > >> > and I've realized something I've missed since I started using >> > LilyPond 4 years ago: LilyPond creates a MIDI track for each staff >> > in a score, which means that a typical score configuration for >> > tablature (Staff + TabStaff) should be set to remove the >> > Staff_performer in TabStaff: >> > >> > \new TabStaff = "Guitar tabs" \with { >> > \remove "Staff_performer" >> > } >> > >> > If you don't remove it, the track will be doubled, so the file size >> > will be double as well as the music (which may results in >> > unattended consequences, like having acoustic and nylon guitar >> > playing at the same time) >> >> Should we remove it by default and add it back when using >> \TabFullNotation? It's perhaps a bit heavy-handed but would cover >> most use cases. >> > > it sounds sensible and easier for new users > > just a doubt: if someone creates a TabStaff only (without > \tabFullNotation) and try to produce a MIDI, what would happen? a MIDi > file with no sound?
Exactly. That's what makes it "a bit heavy-handed". -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
